City of Iron

2013 · Fantasy

City of Iron

Players lead one of four rival nations in a steampunk world of machines, magic, and commerce, developing cities, fleets, and technology across a shared continent and flying isles. Gameplay mixes card-driven engine building and area control: players customize two decks, produce and sell goods like machine parts or bottled demons, research steam-age technologies, recruit mercenaries, and construct or demolish city buildings to manage limited capacity. Ships and airships enable expansion to distant lands and islands, while economic and military routes both offer paths to national dominance.

Players
2–4 best 4
Playing time
120 min
Age
13+
Complexity
3.2 / 5
4.7 on Ludoyafrom $49.94Card GameEconomicOpen DraftingAction PointsVariable Player Powers

On Ludoya's tables

Full stats in Ludoya
4
Plays logged
3
Players
1
In collections
1
On wishlists

4.7/10

from 2 Ludoya reviews

  • Evan4.6

    In this game, players build two different decks of cards simultaneously with the purpose of collecting money to spend on building cards, and attacking neutral town cards, which is all in service of collecting resource symbols which bump your cube on the matching track in the central board. The player with the highest position in each resource will be granted extra money as well as victor points at the end of each of the three scoring rounds. The abstracted map-less area majority game here used to really excite me. The innovation of having these floating provinces distilled down to only needing a single cube to represent your presence there, fueled by card pulls. I also used to be very excited by the two deck element, where one deck is focused more on buildings and the other more on attacking neutral cards, with the neural cards being slightly stronger than the buildings, but the downside is that other players can then attack the cards you defeated to steal them from you, so there's a risk reward thing going on. All that being said, I'm much less into deckbuilders these days than I was when I first was enamored of it. In particular, the way you buy new cards is you can spend whatever money you have left at the end of the round on any card from a fairly large personal supply of cards. Looking through and reading everything at the end of round one is a lot of information to frontload onto players. Then having to manage two draw piles, and make sure you unlock ways to automatically draw from both decks just feels like a pain now where once It was an exciting new challenge. Additionally, the way that military players need to self balance each other is also troublesome. If you wind up with one player going heavy military, and everyone else either doesn't push into military or they do so ineffectively you'll have a run away player and nobody who has even built into the option to slow them down. I still think this is a good game for an ameritrash / euro hybrid enthusiast, but I think it's just not for me anymore. ★ Art, Iconography and components functional ★ Clever or interesting mechanisms ☆ Reasonably low downtime between turns with mildly AP players ★ Multiple plays stay interesting ★ Low or mitigatable luck elements ★★☆☆☆ Raw enjoyment

Read the reviews and rate it

Game facts (players, playing time, age, credits) from BoardGameGeek.